25 May 2020
The Seventh International Symposium on Literature and Environment in East Asia (ISLE-EA) Postponed
We are sorry to announce that the 7th ISLE-EA planned for November 21-22, 2020, is now officially postponed due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Accordingly, we will continue to suspend registration until further notice. The following is our tentative alternative plan of the 7th ISLE-EA.
Main Theme: RETHINKING RESTORATION (no change)
New Dates: most likely late October, 2021; we will confirm the final dates as soon as possible.
Venue: Konan University, Kobe, Japan
All the submitted proposals are under review at the moment. Accepted proposals will be treated in the following ways:
We truly appreciate your patience and understanding.
Vice President of ASLE-Japan
Due to the COVID-19 turmoil, ASLE-Japan has been carefully considering whether the ISLE-EA 2020 Symposium (Nov. 21-22) could be held in Kobe as scheduled. We regard the safety of participants as a top priority and will make a final decision by the end of August. For now, we have decided to suspend registration until further notice.
Thank you for your understanding. Stay safe. We hope that you and your families are all in good health.
The Seventh International Symposium on Literature and Environment in East Asia
21-22 November 2020
Konan University, Kobe, Japan
Call for Papers
The Seventh International Symposium on Literature and Environment in East Asia (ISLE-EA) will be held at Konan University in Kobe, Japan. Kobe, the city closest to the epicenter of the 1995 Great Hanshin Earthquake, was once devastated and has since been the focus of a long-standing effort for rebuilding. After 25 years, with its damage hardly felt directly now, the place invokes a nationally-shared narrative of restoration after catastrophe. Therefore, in the aftermath of the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake, Kobe very naturally came to the minds of many people who remembered and reproduced the stories of the city rebuilding itself. The narrative of restoration might convey a hope—a hope that we can always reclaim normalcy however radically it seems lost.
Choosing for the venue such a symbolic place in terms of Japanese disaster discourse, and with its wider implications for environmental discourse of East Asia and beyond, we present the ISLE-EA 2020 as an occasion for rethinking the idea, and the ideal, of restoration. This term is multivalent, as we realize its cross-contextual use. In the context of environmentalism, “to restore” signifies human efforts to bring back the natural environment to its original, or what some may call “pristine,” state. However, things to be restored always include more than just material matters. Body, mind, life, lifeways, relationships, society, politics, economy—each of these can rightfully appear when we discuss restoration. Moreover, we are often required to restore two or more things which are seemingly incompatible, such as the city and the wild, and economy and natural resources. For instance, efforts to restore the urban environment in which the majority of people live may be hazardous to the natural environment. In our time, which may soon be officially called the Anthropocene, we cannot innocently talk about restoration.
With its essential meaning of “to return,” the idea of restoration also does not fail to raise the question: to return to where and to what? It is a cliché to posit some original, pristine state of nature to which our current degraded nature needs to return. However, should not such thinking be brought into direct conversation with a completely opposite view toward nature; one which sees the natural environment as a process of incessant change? The same can be said about our understanding of the body; is there a pristine state of the body, to which our degraded body enmeshed in the toxic environment can still be brought back? How should we connect the trans-corporeality of our body with the discourse of restoration?
In rethinking restoration, we also need to consider the fact that the term clearly has a political resonance. What can be called a political ideology of restoration has functioned, for instance, as a convenient cover for our critically “inconvenient truth” that it is in no sense possible for us to go back to the time before the 2011 Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster. The ideology of restoration might only make us believe that the impossible can happen, insinuating a false hope into our thoughts—the hope that we can always reclaim normalcy however radically it seems lost! What roles do literature and criticism play in reconsidering an ideology of restoration?
The above are only a few examples of rethinking the idea and ideal of restoration within today’s ecocritical frameworks. We invite papers which discuss narratives, language, and imagination of restoration in East Asia. Potential topics for ISLE-EA 2020 may include, but are not limited to:
Hannes Bergthaller, National Chung-Hsing University, author of
Anthropocene: Key Issues for the Humanities (coauthored, 2020) and Framing the Environmental Humanities (coedited, 2018).
ITO Hiromi, poet, author of Wild Grass on the Riverbank (2015) and Killing Kanoko (2009).
We invite individual and panel proposals. Individual papers should be no more than 20 minutes in length. Please send a 300-word abstract with three to five keywords and a brief biography. For panels of three to four speakers, please send a 500-word abstract with three to five keywords and a one-page CV from the organizer, as well as speaker biographies. Each panel discussion should be under 90 minutes.
Please submit individual and panel proposals to email@example.com by March 10, 2020.
Note: Membership in ASLE (in Japan, Korea, Taiwan, ASEAN, or other regions/countries) is required by the time of registration.